![]() ![]() Nothing from their closed session was made available to the public. While the televised hearing allowed officials to truthfully proclaim that the new Pentagon task force to investigate UAPs is going to be transparent and open to the public, Bray and Moultrie were quick to admonish Congressmen that certain questions could wait until a closed session to be addressed. However, this also marked yet another double-talk hallmark in the long history of UFO lore. The hearing was hailed as a transparent forum where nothing is being hidden from the public about UAPs. The pair were there are representatives of the new Pentagon organization tasked with tracking UFOs: the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group, or AOIMSG for short. Moultrie, - the Defense Department’s Under Secretary for Intelligence - testified under oath and addressed mostly generic questions from a room full of Congressmen. Bray - the Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence - and Ronald S. ![]() Will this be the case with NASA’s study? Will they make their data publicly available in real or near-real time, or will they release either a heavily redacted or a shortened version of their report in 9 months?Īnother example of missing public information on UAPs comes from the May 2022 UFO Congressional hearing, the first of its kind in over a half-century. Indeed, while they can claim to have been transparent in making their reports public, the reports are often so heavily redacted that little to no usable information can be discerned. This is not uncommon when it comes to acquired military and government reports on UAPs. Despite being made publicly available through his FOIA request, all relevant information about the actual shapes of UAPs was redacted. In March 2022, Freedom of Information Act activist John Greenwald published a classified government report on the shapes of UAPs on his website The Black Vault. Whether that public report will include all collected data and conclusions, and whether it will be redacted or not, remains to be seen. NASA believes that allocating $100,000 toward the study of UAPs, a mere 0.0004% of their $23.3 billion overall budget, is more palatable to taxpayers and lawmakers than $100,000 toward the study of UFOs.Įxpected to take about 9 months to complete, the NASA report will be made public.NASA wants to distance itself from the lore and stigma that goes along with the term ‘UFO’.NASA believes the term UAP is the more established scientific term and description.The omission of the term ‘UFO’ could be for several reasons: Perhaps this is their way of saying UAP is the new scientifically correct term. Instead, they get UAP out front and center with the title of the release: “NASA to Set Up Independent Study on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.” From there, ‘UAP’ and ‘Unidentified Aerial Phenomena’ are used ten times. Interestingly, the NASA press release doesn’t bear the acronym UFO anywhere. Per their press release, scientists involved in the study will rigorously identify available UAP data, determine how best to collect future data, and learn how NASA can use that data to advance the scientific understanding of UAPs (). NASA recently announced that they will be joining the Pentagon in the search for answers about Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO)/Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |